Chairmanship:
How you as
chairperson carry out your role has much to do with the success of the
board. A weak chair often fails to move a board along and may be
unable to save the board from indecisiveness and the tendency to dance
around issues. Whereas strong chairs have been known to run
roughly over dissent and participation, the point is not simply that you
should be either retiring or strong. The point is that you should
lead individuals to become a leadership group in which members
never assume they can relax their responsibility because the chair will
be responsible on their behalf Here are a few tips for chairing
more effectively:
-
Be the
chairperson, not an intermittent CEO. Do your own job. The
board has already designated the top administrator. Your role is
to help the board do the job, not to run the organization. Be
clear about the role of the board.
-
Lead the
board, not the Administrator. Your focus should be on the
board, not on staff. The administrator works for the board not
for you. Only the board has the right to tell the administrator what
to do or add to the board’s criteria for judging the administrators
performance (if you have that power). An intermediary can only
detract from crisp accountability.
-
Lead the
board to define its own job. Your purview is not to work
your own agenda for the organization. Even your desire for
better governance has to become the board’s commitment before you can
have much effect. Press the board to explore the ramifications
of its moral (or sometimes legal) trusteeship and to define just what
its job is. When the job is thus defined in its relatively
permanent form, have the board set annual targets within segments of
that job.
-
Lead the
board to design its discipline. When you enforce the rules,
it will be better if you are enforcing board’s rules, not yours.
Help the board examine and plan its process - how the board will deal
with dissent, with renegade members, with attendance, and with coming
to meetings unprepared. Decisions about rules the board chooses
for itself should be written and adopted as board policy.
Without group determined discipline, there will either be insufficient
discipline or you will end up personally creating it.
-
Lead the
board to evaluate its performance. Regularly return the
board to what it adopted about its own job. Has it followed
through? Is it behaving the way it said it would? Be sure you
stick to what the board has adopted as expectations and intentions for
itself. Evaluations done apart from the job description are not
as useful and may be a waste of time.
-
Take
responsibility for the agenda. This is the board’s agenda,
not the staff’s - so don’t leave the agenda to staff. The
board’s job is not to look over what the staff did last month, but to
get its own job done. Developing agendas for specific meetings
will be easier and more board empowering if the board as a body has
engaged itself - even with a broad brush - in annual agenda planning.
-
Run
participative but effective meetings. Keep it open, but keep it
moving! Encourage debate and differences; bring people out; make
it acceptable to disagree. Create an atmosphere of respectful
diversity. Yet do not allow the board to talk an issue to death.
Using a simple poll- “How many have your minds made up already?” - can
yield surprising and enlightening results.
-
Take the
long view - build capability. Efficient meetings are
important, but don’t put your emphasis on the long-term ability of the
board to govern. You won’t worry too much if the board learns
needed skills and insights from it....or grapples meaningfully with an
important issue. The board will be less vulnerable to unhappy
conditions thereafter, such as having a chairperson less wonderful
than you are!
Understand
servant-leadership, understand governance, understand your board...then
you will be ready to help your board understand itself.
Reprinted from
Board Leadership: A Bimonthly Workshop with John Carver. |